Du Preez's late try in the corner knocked Wales out last time these two met in a World Cup. |
Force meet Force
Erasmus and Gatland have developed similar systems for their teams for this tournament. |
Liam Williams is going to have to be on his game, to deal with the South African kicking strategy. |
as primary chaser. Although what was interesting to watch was how South Africa countered this play against Japan in the quarter-finals. They had clearly come prepared for this strategy, and so any time they recovered the ball from a Japan clearance they would kick the ball back to the exact same place it had just come from, knowing that the winger would have just chased the kick. Wales could fall foul of this and will have to ensure that the backfield cover is suitably prepared for the ploy.
As for structured play again both teams operate in a similar fashion whether they have the ball or don't, apart from subtle differences. In attack they like to control the ball, use a lot of phases, and force the opposition to make a lot of tackles. Forward carries in close to the ruck, off nine, used to slowly suck in the defending players, until space opens up elsewhere. The difference between them here is that South Africa like to work the breakdown into the middle of the park so they can switch play down the blindside and catch defences napping. While Wales prefer to focus on the 15-meter channels and utilise the full width of the pitch when they do choose to open the attacking playbook.
Lukhanyo Am was a late find for this South African side, and has proven his ability as a defender |
Defence for both teams hinges on the 13-blitz through Lukhanyo Am and Jonathan Davies, and strong one-on-one head-on-head tackling which stops ball carriers on the gain-line. Both have the same weakness, in that intricate backs moves - and offloads - can critically break the defence, however, neither team possesses and attacking system designed for this and I imagine the attack coaches have been trying to find a way to beat this defence in training. Again there are subtle differences, Wales make use of the spot-blitz at scrum-half as a free radical who can cause chaos, and South Africa also make use of their winger to aid the outside centre on the umbrella blitz to further force offences back. Both systems have their benefits, but both have their inherent risks as well.
At this point of the tournament teams have plenty of tape to review on how to beat their opponents, Wales can study New Zealand, while South Africa will have eyes on Australia and France's plays. But perhaps unique to these two they have all their own game tape to digest as well, an odd circumstance where introspection could provide the answers to beating your rival.
Breakdown Battles
While both teams relish the physical side of the game and will largely look to dominate the game with collisions, Wales will be out-sized, as every team is against South Africa, and so will have to be smart when it comes to their tackle technique. Fortunately, they have developed and mastered the choke tackle over the last few years with Alun Wyn Jones, Justin Tipuric and Ross Moriarty all excellent at keeping ball carriers upright. This will pose an intriguing challenge, since not only will they be trying to hold up mountains, but also against a team who love to engage in mauls who might relish the opportunity the Welsh defenders present them.
Tipuric loves playing South Africa, relishing the combative nature of the games. His defensive skill set really comes to the fore. |
Pollard is a highly accurate goal kicker, from any range, and rarely cracks under pressure. |
The penalty count will be critical in this game as Pollard and Biggar are both superb goalkickers, and both will punish any lapses in judgement or poor decisions. Penalties will play a big factor in this game, as they can drastically swing momentum at critical junctures. And when it comes to knock-out games momentum can mean everything.
Injury Report
Such is the nature of a tournament like this, attrition is the name of the game. Teams have to have strength in depth and be able to adapt and overcome any injuries which appear during the six weeks. The nature of that caught Wales out four years ago, where they went into the game against the Springboks with no true fullback, a first cap outside centre, and half a dozen other injuries as well.
Navidi could be a big loss to the Welsh backrow in a physical encounter. |
South Africa are in much better shape, with the vast majority of their team completely injury-free, although super-star winger Cheslin Kolbe has been ruled out with an ankle injury. George North will be breathing a sigh of relief, as those dancing feet can make a mockery of even the tightest defences. In a game of two resolute defences, Kolbe could have been the spark of magic South Africa needed to claim victory.
Prediction
As with England and New Zealand, this game is incredibly hard to call. Even more so here due to the similarities in style between the two teams. Small facets will add up to swing this game, which team can win at the breakdown, which can win at the set-piece, and who will crack under pressure Biggar or Pollard when it comes to goal kicks. It could all come down to which team simply refuses to lose, to be honest, and if that's the case Wales have shown that of any team left in the tournament they are the most stubborn when losing.
Putting my money where my mouth is, I think South Africa have the edge, they're less beaten up, have a terrifying set-piece and the slightly longer range off the tee. But Wales have their number in recent times so who knows.
No comments:
Post a Comment